How Important is the Encryption Debate? Essay -- Encryption Market Ess

How Important is the Encryption Debate? The encryption debate is intense and heated in accredited circles, but is of no major concern to the vast majority of people in the United States. Most of the people I talk to regard its convention to be of little consequence, or too complicated to take a position on. Indeed, the prevailing opinion I encounter is that is an area best leftfield to the experts who understand its capabilities, uses and dangers. While no one really trusts the government, in the face of the sundry bogeymen evoked by law enforcement agents as a rationale for defend the people, most people are hard pressed to stand up and speak of the inviolability of their silence rights. How can I justify my concerns over personal privacy when faced with the specters of kidnappers, terrorists and drug lords? Why get worked up about it if you have nothing to hide anyway? Why insist to uphold seemingly inconsequential principles in the face of national security concerns? The rea son is that the principles fostering this heated debate are some of the core principles that formed our nation. This nation was created by the go forth of revolutionaries who challenged the principles of government (or lack thereof) that was imposed upon the colonies. After fighting a bloody war to secure independence, the colonies were forged into a nation of states upon federalist principles. It was a government of express powers and sovereignties that bore the stamp of the framers distrust of an over-centralized government. The Bill of Rights was added to further confirm those federalist principles and to ensure the rights of the people onward their government. These rights are the cornerstones upon which the United States was built and has flourished. ... ...affic analysis that could be even off more significant than census information. Where are the people going next? This is how the Government stays one step ahead, instead of trying to shape insurance through polling us, it notes our patterns of choices and plans accordingly. What does free market encryption really give us in response? The power to communicate as freely as we did before technological advances undermined those abilities. The Fourth Amendment was designed to be a limitation on the power of government to intrude on the privacy of its citizens, not a relent of privilege to law enforcement. Much as the framers of the Constitution expected to be free from surveillance in their papers and communications, the power of encryption can serve well regain the balance. And once it does, maybe we will realize that we had more in common with Paine and Jefferson than we think.